|
|
Please consider making a donation to LLSC
|
Press Releases
|
Article from EnglandFans Message Board |
|
|
Wednesday, 03 September 2008 |
|
What is it
that Guinness advert proclaims? "All good things come to those who
wait". Well the Footballing Authorities may not have to wait too much
longer until their transition of the game is complete. To rid the game of the
bad and populate it only with the good. No more rowdy behaviour, no more rebels
of society daring to stand up and make their feelings known, no more problems.
Their ideals consist of fans turning up every week, queuing to gain entry in an
orderly fashion, having booked their tickets 3 months in advance. Entering the
stadium and taking their seats, rising only to applaud goals where they dance
along to carefully selected music over the PA, before clearing up their litter
and disappearing into the countryside until the following weekend. No hassle,
no passion, no noise.
"They'll only miss us once we've gone"
As the game I know and love becomes more diluted by the passing year, I often
wonder just when the breaking point will come. When will those authorised with
sanitising our game realise the error of their ways? Or can they not actually
see that they are breaking the very foundations of what has made this sport a
success? Pound signs blur their vision, seen all too often in every walk of
life. Greed takes over, people want more. They've exhausted the Premier League
"brand" and now have visions of taking it further afield; the
infamous "Game 39". Translated to you and me, meaning they have
milked pretty much every penny they can from the "consumers" in this
country, and now want to tap into the pockets of those football hungry
consumers overseas. All in the name of expanding the pockets of the
shareholders, players and governing bodies of our sport. Our sport, not theirs.
If I rewind 7 or 8 years; I'm leaving the house on a matchday and making my way
to Anfield. There was no need to ring around in the morning; I'd just turn up
and walk into one of two or three pubs around the ground, and would bump into
people I knew. You knew where everyone would drink, and had done for years. The
same faces, the people that made this club what it is. I can pop my head into
those same pubs now, and I wouldn't recognise a soul. Those long standing
supporters have now all but disappeared, replaced by families from all over,
decked out in official replica sportswear and taking pictures of anything that
moves. There's a smaller crowd of us left and tend to keep out of the way. We
don't conform. Those areas around the ground have now been taken over by the
new brigade, while the old guard retreat to pastures further afield.
Year after year, more and more people are dropping away. There's still a
hardcore of a few hundred that travel everywhere. There's still thousands that
go to every home game just like they always have. But it's becoming harder and
harder for these people to carry on. Supporters being replaced by consumers.
Participants being replaced by spectators. Just how much higher can the bar be
raised by the controlling bodies before they've pushed away everyone that gave
the game it's appeal in the first place? What happens when the passion
disappears for good? You can't manufacture passion, no matter how hard some
clubs try.
They have mascots running up and down the touchline trying to encourage the
fans. At Bolton they play "I feel good" when they score, with two
young lads running the length of the pitch with big flags. Music played after
goals is now commonplace, as if fans don't know how to celebrate a goal by
themselves. Is it because they realise the passion is dead and are trying to
hang onto a small semblence of it? Or is it aimed at manufacturing a friendly
atmosphere to suit their agenda?
Manufactured support; I can't think of anything worse. Handing out those
clappers seems to be the next step this season, with the whole of St.Andrews
clapping along with them before their opening game. This in a ground that used
to be known as one of the most passionate and hostile in football; now
transformed into a childrens play ground with everybody doing as they are told.
Sat down and singing what the club want them to sing, and clapping when they
want them to clap. So sad. Ticket prices on the increase there every season,
and a ground I now refuse to visit. £40 for an away ticket some 4 years ago. No
thanks. It doesn't take a genius to work out why they barely fill half of that
ground any more.
Newcastle had their lowest league attendance for nearly a decade at the
weekend, with cash turnstiles in operation, entry for £10 if you bought a
replica shirt and other such promotions, but still had thousands of empty
seats. Manchester United have been contacting everybody on their mailing lists
trying to push season ticket sales again this summer. Whereas Old Trafford used
to be like Fort Knox when it came to getting in, they're now closer to
resembling one of the happy hour bars in Benidorm, with teenagers stood outside
handing out cards with promotional offers to encourage trade. What was once a
closed shop, is now opening it's doors and trying to drag people in off the
streets.
Is the football bubble about to burst? I hope so.
On Monday night, Portsmouth's most famous fan, the bell ringer with the blue
hair, or less commonly known as "John", was approached by the ground
staff at Fratton Park and asked to keep the noise down. I'm sure it's not only
me that's absolutely staggered by that. Asked to stop ringing his bell and keep
the noise down, in a football ground! The mind boggles. But it's another notch
on the many that have been made previously, in slowly sanitising the way we
support our teams.
We are told we're not allowed to stand up as it's unsafe; yet rugby sides play
in exactly the same stadia and those rules don't apply. Apparently it's safe
for rugby fans to stand in those same seated areas, but not football fans (the
reasons for that I could write a book on, and will address again). It's
madness. They're also allowed to drink in their seats while watching the game.
I know of a fan that was facing a 3 year football banning after peering over
the exits at White Hart Lane to catch a goal he'd missed when coming down early
at half time. He'd walked down the steps, was handed a pint by a friend, and
heard the roar from the stands. He went halfway back up the steps to see what
had happened, when two officers arrested him for consuming alcohol in view of
the playing surface. It defies belief. But I'm told we're different. As our
friend from Portsmouth has pointed out this week; would this sort of
discrimination be accepted anywhere else, or by anyone else, but football fans?
I was on a final warning in my old season ticket seat for foul and abusive
language. I was reported by fellow fans for swearing, and risked losing my
season ticket. Now in that seat, I was reserved, very reserved. It was on the
halfway line and not a noise was made all season by anyone. They were
spectators, I'm a participant, or like to be. I want to go to the game and let
off some steam. I go to work to pay the bills, put a roof over the family
heads, and to enjoy myself during my time off. I choose to do that at the
football, something I've grown up with. It's always been a part of who I am.
But in that seat, I had to control myself and just sit and watch the game,
conforming to those around me for over 7 years. I must have sworn a handful of
times in that entire period, when telling the referee where to go or some other
trivial slip of the tongue. Yet I faced losing my season ticket and not being
able to support my side over it. I was one swear word away from walking away
from the game for good. If this was in a family enclosure I'd understand. I
know when swearing is unacceptable, and in my view, a football ground is one of
those places where it fits.
When I go to the match, I want to stand with fellow fans, my friends. I want to
participate in the game, I want to support the side. I want to shout and I want
to sing. I want to do the things that made me fall in love with the game and
going to the match. But one by one, the authorities are trying to take all
those things out of our game. To have us sat in silence, only singing when they
want us to sing, and singing the songs they want us to sing. Blaring music over
the PA system we are supposed to dance along to. We're unable to create an
atmosphere ourselves it seems. For the future, see American sports for how it
will go. Club issue foam hands can already be seen, dancing girls have been
tried, the list goes on.
Keep sanitising; you'll soon be wondering where it all went wrong, when the
very people that made this game what it is, have all long since disappeared.
There's not many of us left. Soon there will be none.
Enjoy modern football. Enjoy scratching your heads in some plush office arguing
with each other about who's to blame when the crowds start to stay away. I'll
be long past the caring stage. You'll have brought it upon yourselves and
destroyed a game loved by millions in the process. I hope it's worth it.
|
|
|
LETTER SENT TO THE FA ON 9-JUN-08 ON BEHALF OF LLSC / TIL / LTSC |
|
|
Monday, 09 June 2008 |
|
Dear Lord Triesman
We are the Chairmen of the three supporters groups
that represent the significant majority of Luton Town supporters all across the
globe. Each group appeals to different kinds of supporters, but since the Club
entered administration in November 2007 we have increasingly worked together to
create unity across the fan-base during difficult and unsettling times and also
to help the Administrator vet potential suitors for the Club given the dubious
track record of previous owners. In this respect Brendan Guilfoyle has stated
on the record that he was very grateful for our co-operation during the whole
administration process.
We have been fully behind the LTFC 2020 consortium
("2020") and while there is much to be warmly applauded in their business plan
we were particularly impressed with their complete openness and honesty, their
clear intentions about operating in a transparent manner and also their
intention to address basic issues such as ensuring the Club only operates
within its financial means. They are also heavily committed to regenerating
both the youth side of the Club and creating greater cohesion with the local
community and having greater fan participation. In respect of involvement in
the community you will be aware through the FA's dealings with Butch Fazal of the big steps that need to and can be made in such
a multi-cultural town as Luton.
In essence all the three supporters groups gave their
100% backing to the 2020 team, have continued to work with them and will do so
if/ when the Football League finally confirm their ownership of the Football
Club and transfer of the ‘golden share'. I'm sure if you have read the business
plan and associated documents sent to you by 2020 you will agree with our
common view that this is a blueprint that can be adopted in the future across
the whole footballing community as it contains
principles that the Football Association and Football League as governing bodies
and regulators will undoubtedly be fully committed to.
Therefore it is with great regret that we jointly
write this communication following confirmation of the penalties the Football
Association imposed on Luton Town Football Club on Wednesday 4th June 2008.
We are 100% behind the principle of clamping down on
unacceptable behaviour at football clubs and in
particular actions which ultimately cheat the fans. In our
view punishments should be harsh and offenders should be liable to
judiciary sentences where applicable. In today's game when so much money is
involved there is the need for strict regulation and it is unquestionable that
there should be transparency and honest conduct from those that run the Clubs
especially those who control the financial management side.
Further to the findings of Peter Griffiths QC we have
a number of questions that we would like to be answered on behalf of all Luton
fans and other fans/ clubs round the country that have taken an enormous
interest in this case and have also been shell-shocked by the apparent
injustice served on the Club in the form of the £50,000 fine and ten-point
deduction for the 2008/09 season which is considered hugely disproportionate to
the crime and lack of on-the-field benefit gained.
-
Cherry Newbery, the Club Secretary,
initially alerted the Football Association to certain irregular activities by
the then owners (Messrs Tomlins, Peter, Bagehot and Mitchell) two years ago yet no action was taken
until Mike Newell alerted the national media of dishonesty in the game. We
would ask that given the gravity of the allegations being raised by a respected
administrator, why has no action been taken until the matter was given wider
exposure through the media?
- If Mike Newell had never made his plea to the
authorities to stamp out dishonesty in the game,can you categorically
confirm that any subsequent investigation would have actually taken place?
- Given the subsequent punishments handed out, do you
not feel that dishonesty wins, i.e. those who discover irregularities yet do
not inform the authorities are the actual winners, despite knowingly cheating
the game whereas those that act professionally and honestly, not only in
alerting the authorities but also behaving impeccably and truthfully
throughout any investigative process, suffer with more severe punishments? Don't you think that this approach is self-defeating
and will only end up deterring others from whistle-blowing?
-
Following on from this, is it right that
the Clubs receive higher punishments than the actual guilty perpetrators? As in
the case of Luton Town why should the Club and fans suffer through direct
punishment when the guilty parties have long since departed the Club. Can the reasoning behind this be explained
please? A simple analogy here is that we buy a 2nd-hand car that 2 years
previously was caught speeding and also involved in a hit and run
accident.Upon buying the car we pay for all the repairs then suddenly
get hit by a speeding fine, a driving ban and charged for the hit and run. That
seems completely unjust but is actually very similar to the situation that 2020
will be inheriting, without further consideration for the fans.
-
Can you also clarify for us what
footballing advantages the club is deemed to have gained by these irregular
technicalities that as we understand that the actual payments were not illegal
and actual issues just surround the source of, origin and lack of formal
disclosure? Surely two consecutive relegations on the back of actions of the
previous owners is evidence of the highest order that very little overall
benefit was gained if any.
- We are also bemused by the statement relating to the
agents. Surely if regulations relating to agents have been significantly
reviewed subsequent to the alleged payments that allow the accused agents to
receive nothing more than a 'slap on the wrist', then surely this implies that
same approach should be taken on the issues directly connected
to the Club.
- Many people in football are
astounded by the inconsistency of Peter Griffiths' decision when considering
the decision made on 27-April-2007 relating to West Ham United when they were
fined £5.5m but spared any points deduction. The
reasoning behind this in the report outlining the outcome attributed this to
the change of management/ ownership and the guilty plea from West Ham's owners.
The report also took pity on the fans and the fight against relegation. Given
the precedent set here when West Ham actually benefited by gaining points
through playing ineligible players can you clarify why Peter Griffiths QC took
a different approach when deciding on the penalty in the Luton Town case when
the wrongdoing was only technical and administrative?
Supporters of clubs all over the country put great
faith in both the Football Association and Football League to govern and
regulate the game diligently whilst protecting the interests of supporters, who
are the true fabric of the game and without whom the game would simply not
exist. There has been a disturbing increase in recent years in the number of
Clubs that have run into financial difficulties and, at Luton Town, we are no
strangers to this very sad state of affairs that often leads to job losses and
local companies losing many thousands of pounds.
As supporters we trust the FA to govern sufficiently
robust ‘fit and proper' tests to screen potential owners of all professional
league clubs. This is especially true of those coming out of an administration
or receivership. In the case of Luton Town, two of the parties who became
involved had highly questionable track records which should have raised
serious concerns and prevented these individuals from ever being involved.
If the Football Association is truly committed to all
levels of football then it should be providing far greater help to Clubs that
get into financial trouble with appropriate guidance thereafter. However, this
seems anything but the case at the present time.
By making such a heavy charge on Luton Town the
Administrator will have to seek up front cash from 2020 before lodging an
appeal to seek due justice. These funds will unfortunately be
diverted from the one area that 2020 had budgeted to spend more money on
in the coming years, namely the youth development and community programmes. How does this then fit with the commitment of
the Football Association towards grass roots football?
Once again the big losers here are the fans. There is
huge resentment to the treatment that has been meted out to Luton Town
supporters who have done nothing wrong other than having subscribed as young
children into the "Luton Town family" and getting hooked on the beautiful game
and all that it offers.
Many now, and not just those at Luton, are accusing
the Football Association of using bullying tactics and again coming down far
heavier on a smaller club than a bigger club that would have far greater
financial capability to challenge any such decision via independent tribunal.
It is hard to take a different view, even when you take the emotion out of the
situation.
Constant abuse of smaller clubs should not be
tolerated especially when in the case of Luton Town, through 2020, we now
aim to get our house in order and ensure by way of a long-term
focused, sensible and comprehensive business plan there is stability, strict
financial discipline and high ethics running all the way through the Club.
We appreciate that we have raised many issues in this
letter. However we would ask that you provide us with a timely response to all
the questions outlined above. We would then pass your response on to our
supporters.
We would also sincerely hope that in view of the
parlous state of many clubs' finances that the FA will be looking to set up an
early warning system that would flag up clubs in financial difficulties before
they find themselves plunged into administration or receivership.
As a matter of courtesy please note we will also be
copying this letter to all our respective members as well as members of the
press, 2020, Brendan Guilfoyle, local politicians, the Football League, FIFA,
UEFA, the FSF and Supporters Direct.
We look forward to receiving your response and
appreciate the time you take to deal with our issues.
Yours sincerely
Kevin Lennon - Chairman, Loyal Luton Supporters Club
Liam Day -
Chairman, Trust in Luton
Kevin Barrett - Chairman, Luton Town Supporters Club
|
|
| << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 2 of 24 |
|
|